Welcome! Login | Register
 

Sunday Political Brunch: The Roy Moore Fallout—December 17, 2017—Sunday Political Brunch: The Roy Moore Fallout --…

Will The Seattle Seahawks Pass The Torch On Sunday?—Will The Seattle Seahawks Pass The Torch On…

Alex and Ani Announces Charity by Design Collection By Celebrities Cuoco, Moore & Olsen—Alex and Ani Announces Charity by Design Collection…

Sunday Political Brunch: Is this a Franken-Stein Strategy?—December 10, 2017—Sunday Political Brunch: Is this a Franken-Stein Strategy?…

Running Down The LA Rams – Can The Seahawks Catch Cinderella?—Running Down The LA Rams – Can The…

Weiss: Medicare Takes a Blow Under GOP’s Major Tax Plan Fix—Weiss: Medicare Takes a Blow Under GOP’s Major…

Della Volpe Unveils Insights on “Morning Joe”—“Most Millennials Fearful of Future”—Della Volpe Unveils Insights on "Morning Joe" --…

Traumatic Brain Injury – The Impact Of Football-Related Concussions—Traumatic Brain Injury – The Impact Of Football-Related…

Assuming Willie Taggart Leaves For FSU, Who Should Be Oregon’s Next Coach?—Assuming Willie Taggart Leaves For FSU, Who Should…

Columbia Sportswear & Star Wars Unveil Jackets Based on “The Empire Strikes Back”—Columbia Sportswear & Star Wars Unveil Jackets Based…

 
 

Saul Kaplan: So Many Corporate Innovation Labs, So Little Innovation

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

 

It’s the innovator’s day. CEOs everywhere know that keeping their companies relevant in a rapidly changing world is imperative and that innovation is the solution. Corporate leaders also know their legacies depend on their organization’s ability to reinvent itself.

It’s not going well.

The CEOs I talk with admit privately that they’re getting tired of hearing Uber, Airbnb and Netflix disruption stories. They want their organizations to play more offense. They want to be market-makers, not just share-takers.

In response, CEOs have climbed onto the innovation-lab bandwagon. Corporate innovation labs have sprung up like weeds across industries around the world. Any self-respecting CEO now has a corporate innovation lab!

I have visited many of these innovation labs and spoken with those who’ve been tapped on the shoulder to start and lead them. My overall impression is that, at best, most of these innovation labs will produce only tweaks to today’s business models.

Innovation labs will launch with lofty rhetoric from CEOs about transformation and thinking out-of-the-box. But as soon as line executives and business unit leaders get control of the lab’s agenda, it is destined to produce only tweaks. This shouldn’t be a surprise, because corporate innovation labs are structured, resourced and governed to produce incremental improvements to today’s business models.

Lab projects are prioritized and funded to produce new products, services and tech-enabled capabilities that will improve performance of today’s business. The projects compete for resources based on financial metrics relevant to the current business model.

There is nothing wrong with that approach—leaders should always improve their current business model to stay competitive. But here’s the rub—today’s corporate innovation labs won’t help a company avoid being ‘netflixed’ or disrupted by an entirely different business model.

My conclusion: Corporate innovation labs aren’t set up in ways that will help companies avoid disruption. Here’s why.

10 Reasons Corporate Innovation Labs Produce Only Tweaks

 

1) Innovation lab mandates aren’t clear. Incremental versus transformational innovation require very different organizational approaches and support.

2) CEOs must own the transformational agenda. Instead they cede authority to line executives who are accountable for the performance of today’s business model.

3) Innovation labs overemphasize the production of a better mousetrap, as opposed to a better business model.

4) Potential innovation projects that may cannibalize current business are taken off the table, severely limiting the innovation lab’s scope.

5) Requiring a financial forecast for an innovation project—before exploring it in the real world—only works for tweaks, never for transformation.

6) Corporate innovation labs see emerging technologies through the lens of today’s business model, as opposed to a catalyst for an entirely new model.

7) Corporate innovation labs have difficulty shifting their perspective to see opportunities through the lens of customer experience and jobs-to-be-done.

8) Corporate venture funds are not innovation labs. They may provide startup capital to entrepreneurs, but withhold the company’s most important assets: scalable capabilities and market access.

9) Innovation labs aren’t organized as a connected adjacency to the core, a sandbox where capabilities can be combined and recombined, to change how customer value is created, delivered and captured.

10) Companies lack the talent systems to develop future leaders with experience working both in the core and in the innovation lab.

 

I think we all know that tweaks are necessary—we should all get better every day. But tweaks aren’t sufficient. If tweaking the way things worked today were enough, life would be so much easier. Sometimes we need transformation, and this is one of those times. In the 21stcentury, the most important life skill—and corporate capability—is reinvention,.

Transformation, disruption and reinvention don’t have to be scare words. We can create the conditions to explore and test entire new business models while we are still pedaling the bicycle of today’s models.

An important mandate for these new innovation labs is to do R&D for new business models, the same way we do R&D today for new products, services and technologies. R&D for new business models is the new strategic imperative. Corporate innovation strategies must create discrete approaches to deliver incremental improvements to today’s models, while also enabling the exploration of entire new models. Doing so It will require more clarity on the objectives of the innovation lab, as well as and recognition that the same structure, approach, resourcing, staffing and governance will not work for both incremental and transformational innovation.

It’s a good thing CEOs are taking innovation seriously. I sense they’re realizing that just setting up an innovation lab and delegating it to line executives isn’t enough, and they’re right. I’m finding more CEOs open to talking about how business model innovation fits into their strategic agendas, and I predict we will begin to see this new imperative better reflected in their organizational approaches to innovation.

Today I stand by my observation: So many corporate innovation labs, so little innovation. Tomorrow I expect we will see more corporate business model sandboxes to make R&D for new business models an ongoing strategic capability.

Saul Kaplan is the Founder and Chief Catalyst of the Business Innovation Factory (BIF). Saul shares innovation musings on his blog at It’s Saul Connected and on Twitter at @skap5.

 

Related Slideshow: Oregon Business Rankings in US

See how Oregon stacked up against the other states in the U.S.

Prev Next

ThumbTack

Oregon gets a C+ for small business friendliness from Thumbtack, in conjunction with the Kauffman Foundation.

According to the ranking:

Overall friendliness C+

Ease of starting a business B
Ease of hiring D+
Regulations D
Health & safety D
Employment, labor & hiring D
Tax code D+
Licensing C-
Environmental D
Zoning D+
Training & networking programs B+

Prev Next

CEO Magazine

CEO magazine was not kind to Oregon.

The state ranked in the bottom ten states at #42.

Oregon get lumped by CEO's as being California like - too much regulation.

Prev Next

Forbes

The 2015 rankings puts Oregon in the top 20. Oregon ranks #18 in the United States. 

NY ranks one spot ahead at #17 and Florida ranks after Oregon.

#1 in the United States: Utah

#50 in the United States: Mississippi

Prev Next

WalletHub

Oregon has been ranked as the 2nd most eco-friendly state in the country, according to a recent study by WalletHub

Oregon ranks eighth in environmental quality and first in Eco-Friendly Behaviors landing them in second overall. 

Oregon is behind Vermont and ahead of New York and Minnesota who land in the third and fourth spots respectively. 

Prev Next

The Economist

Small Business Friendliness Grade: C+

The Economist grades states on an A+ to F grading scale for its small business climate. Oregon is one of 4 states that earned a "C+"

Overbearing bureaucracy and excessive licensing is stifling small business in America. 

Read More About The Economist Grade Here

Prev Next

CNBC

#22 CNBC

CNBC ranks each state in cost of doing business, economy, technology and innovation.

Read More About CNBC Ranking Here

Prev Next

Wallet Hub

#28 Wallet Hub

Wallet Hub ranks each state in ROI rank, state tax rank, and overall government services.

Read More About Wallet Hub Ranking Here

Prev Next

#38 Kauffman Foundation

Kauffman Foundation ranks each state in entrepreneurship.

Entrepreneurial activity generally is highest in Western and Southern states and lowest in Midwestern and Northeastern states.

Read More About Kauffman Ranking Here

Prev Next

Forbes

#19 Forbes in 2014

Forbes ranks each state in business costs, economic climate, and growth prospects.

Read More About Forbes Rankings Here

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

X

Stay Connected — Free
Daily Email