Homelessness Divides City Council and Businesses
Friday, September 18, 2015
Two prominent business owners from the Chinatown area filed complaints that were taken up during this week’s city council meeting. Though the complaints were discussed among the council, no resulting action was taken. For many local businesses, it's no surprise.
“They focused on the problem, but they didn’t focus on the solutions,” Karen Bowler, owner of Tube and Fortune in China town and one of the complainants, told GoLocal. “It’s all so vague and far off. There’s no action and literally nothing we can do.”
Complications for Businesses
The homeless population of Chinatown has deterred potential business due to the volatile nature of specific individuals, according to business owners, who said they are tired of the abuse and fed up with the lack of help from the City Council.
“They’ve been ignoring it for five years now," Kurt Huffman, owner of Chef’s Table, told GoLocal about the City Council. "The problems are showing up to work and having your door used as a bathroom all night long. We have to wipe human waste off our property each morning."
Chinatown business owners typically have two options if they wish to remove a homeless person from their doorways. They can put up signs discouraging trespassing and call the police if individuals do trespass. Another option: business owners can call local company Clean and Safe (Portland’s Security Guard service) to move a homeless person from the stoop to the curb.
“I have to ask my husband when we drive to work, ‘can you pull up so I don’t have to step on someone to get to our business',” Bowler said. “One man physically climbed onto a delivery truck and threatened to kill the driver. He is often naked or relieving himself in front of our door. And when he is in a mood and people walk by, he looks for a reaction. It creates an unfriendly business environment.”
Bowler noted that she would like to expand the hours of her club, Tube, so that it could be open earlier and increase business. However, Bowler notes that most of her customers do not arrive until, at around 10 p.m. or 11 p.m., out of fear. After 10 p.m. on a weekend, the homeless population are overshadowed by nightlife and there is more of a police presence. However, the police presence is not always positive for local business.
Huffman agreed with Bowler.
“Here is the great irony: the only business that is marketed is nightlife," Huffman said. "The area is inundated with cops and the homeless people just clear out. It’s an awful place for homeless people to be after 9 PM on the weekends. There are cops everywhere, lots of people. Both the nightlife scene that creates this perfect environment for bars – and the homeless population – is horrible for bars because of the police presence.”
Though the police presence is more active during the weekend and the evening, many business owners wonder what possible resolutions could salvage business during the week.
“One thing that they’re (the City Council) talking about – that we are rooting for – is a foot patrol in Chinatown,” Bowler said. “We don’t have a problem with homeless people: we have a problem with homelessness. We need someone down here who is able to distinguish who needs what.”
Other business owners have different solutions in mind. Currently, a self-run homeless camp called “R2D2” (Right 2 Dream Too) is the only visible current solution. R2D2 is run on private property, where those running the camp pay a dollar a day to the property owner.
“The property owner is the real villain we don’t speak of,” Huffman said.
One of Huffman’s businesses, a restaurant called Ping, was closed nine months after R2D2 was opened. Huffman proposes an alternative solution.
“For the first four years that the homeless camp was there, you have an empty hotel across the street (temporarily),” Huffman said. “Why don’t we put these people inside a city-owned building. The only justification for saying you can’t is because the city code doesn’t allow it. But we are allowing people to stay in a parking lot that already violates every possible city code there is. It’s a terrible argument that it’s okay to violate some city codes, but not others.”
Since the opening of R2D2, Chinatown businesses have seen a fiscal dip. "Looking year to year from when the camp went in, we saw a 20% drop in revenue versus a 5% increase the month prior. I have continued to see business decline since then," Christopher Handford, owner of the Davis Street Tavern, told GoLocal.
Huffman called R2D2 "the ultimate example of the city allowing a population to run without any rules or regulations. It exacerbates the problem from a business perspective when you don’t enforce regulations and allow it to fester. It’s anarchy.”
Concerns Fall on 'Deaf Ears'
“Do you think a 100 person homeless camp taking over a park in The Pearl would last two days? Do you think that a 100 person homeless camp that decides to post on Amanda Fritz’s lawn would last two days?” Huffman asked. “Of course not.”
It’s possible that the Portland City Council is afraid to tackle the issue of homelessness as it might interfere with reelection campaigns.
“There are solutions to deal with homelessness that are creative and interesting,” Huffman said. “The city has not addressed those and I think it’s because everybody in the council is petrified to make hard decisions. Politically, it’s an unpopular topic.”
Other business owners stress the importance of pointing out the apathy of the City Council.
“If our concerns fall on deaf ears, we are going to have to move,” Bowler said. “I see it wearing us down at some point.”
Related Slideshow: 6 States With The Highest Homelessness Rates
These six states all had at least 300 out of 100,000 people homeless in 2013.
- Oregon Hits 4th Highest Homelessness Rate In Country
- Portland to Purchase Land for New Homeless Rest Area
- Portland Cops Hand Out Cell Phone Numbers to Homeless
- Is Portland’s Homeless Problem Undermining its Potential?
- Is Portland Bolstering Homeless Numbers to Get More Federal Funding?