The Fake News Controversy Is Larger Than You Think

Monday, December 12, 2016

Joe Clifford, Guest MINDSETTER™

Mainstream media, for many years has been able to control the narrative and push their positions and the government’s, which are, for the most part, one and the same. Most of the time a trusting public has been too busy trying to survive a weak economy, so they have not figured out they are constantly fed distortions, exaggerations, and sometimes outright likes.

Cases in point follow. The US public bought into the government and media narrative, that Iraq had WMD, and consequently made war on Iraq which took at least a million lives for no legitimate reason. Many experts knew full well that the intelligence had been altered and shaped to meet the need of the media and government, but their voices were excluded from the debate by mainstream media. In the same way, third parties have been excluded from debates and exposure by mainstream media for years. Progressives such as Dennis Kucinich were marginalized by the corporate media, and in the past election, the voice of Jill Stein was muted by media.

The recent election, I suggest, overwhelmingly proves my point. In the early days of the primary Donald Trump was the media darling. His rivals cried foul because Trump was covered 24-7 by the corporate media, and rivals felt they could not compete with the free publicity and exposure Trump was given. Indeed, FAIR, a reliable media watchdog, calculated Trump received about 2 billion dollars’ worth of free air time, proving the cry of foul by his rival’s to be legitimate. Media did not care; Trump was so outlandish he was making money for the media moguls. At some point, however, media realized they created a Frankenstein, and quickly reversed their course. Trump instantly became the devil incarnate, and negative stories about him and his candidacy prevailed.

The turning point developed when Trump announced he had no reason to fight Russia, and saw no reason why we could not peacefully work with Russia, improving relations for both countries, and therefore the world. Mainstream media, the corporate pro war voice, could not take this kind of insolence. Their narrative was Russia and Putin were a threat, and should be treated that way, so they turned their pens and cameras on Trump and tried to bring him down. Media promotes war. The New York Times with Judith Miller, helped lie us into a war with Iraq, and has been pushing us into a confrontation with Russia, along with the Washington Post. For two years, Russia has been blamed for everything, despite the absence of proof for any of the accusations. Russia had been thoroughly demonized by the media in the same way that Manuel Noriega, Muammar Gaddafi, and Saddam Hussein, had been demonized. The demonizing has proven itself to be the first step in setting the stage for war, and it appears with the complete vilification of Putin and Russia by corporate media, we are on the way to a war. A horrible thought.

Meanwhile, Trump won the election. Hate him or like him, give him credit for winning the election with the entire establishment against him. His own party would not contribute to his campaign, corporate media was solidly behind Hillary, and gave her a complete pass on the content of damaging e-mails from within her campaign. Media chose to gloss over the illegal Clinton team tactics of sabotaging Sanders, and focused on those nasty Russians. Almost every major newspaper endorsed the Clinton campaign, yet Trump prevailed. Corporate media was truly shocked; not that Trump won, but because they had lost control. They controlled the narrative, but lost control of the voters. The voters voted the wrong way! Make no mistake; this writer is not, nor will ever be, in the Trump camp, nor am I a Hillary supporter. I did not have a dog in this fight, so I watched it as an outsider or spectator, who saw things that others, who might have been emotionally committed, did not see. It is clear that media tried to promote Hillary, and was horrified that they had lost the ability to control the narrative and the public.

The “fake news “controversy is nothing more than corporate media’s attempt to slander alternative media, because corporate media finally realized they lost control, and no one takes them seriously. By and large, people do not read newspapers, nor do mainstream news outlets and cable news have any credibility. Corporate media had to do something to regain control of the narrative, and they attempted to do so with the fake news nonsense, and with the assistance of their gal Hillary Clinton. They are trying to convince the public it is only they who can be trusted. This is an effort to recapture the public and regain control of the narrative. They are frightened and shocked; for the first time they lost control of the narrative. Their effort is akin to Chris Cuomo, CNN anchor, telling the US public it was illegal for them to read the contents of WikiLeaks e-mails, and that only news outlets were legally able to read those e-mails. Cuomo entreated the public to let CNN interpret the emails, and tell you what is important. His amateurish attempt, made him a laughing stock. The fake news controversy is Cuomo’s effort magnified tenfold. Trust us, and no one else, they suggest. Everything outside of corporate media is “fake”, they insist.

How stupid does corporate media think we are?

Related Slideshow: 5 Reasons Why 2016 May Be the Most Chaotic Year Ever in Media

Prev Next

#1-Rich Guys

The new “future” of newspapers in the top 25 is that billionaires rescue the newspaper and leverage the newspaper’s assets for any number of reason. It is not in their nature to take a hands off approach - these guys are micro managing distribution vendors and loading times on mobile. Here are three of an ever growing number.

Boston Globe: Billionaire, investor, sports team owner John Henry - who also is a part owner in the Boston Red Sox, started selling off assets of the Boston Globe and is selling the plant and real estate. He has made investments in the newsroom. Henry just stubbed his toe when he went to save money on the outsourced distribution structure and the new distributor had significant delivery problems. A reported 15 to 20 percent of subscribers has issues. Late in 2015, the paper laid off a reported 45 in 2015. Estimated Net Worth: $2.1 Billion

Las Vegas Review-Journal: Billionaire, gaming tycoon and GOP Super PAC Funder Sheldon Adelson - According to Media expert Ken Doctor in his recent column, “The company that runs the Las Vegas Review-Journal is taking steps this week to repair its reputation after a series of reports of sketchy-seeming journalistic practices related to the recent sale of the newspaper to casino magnate Sheldon Adelson.” The company that is going to run it — GateHouse Media which also owns the Worcester Telegram and the Providence Journal. Estimated Net Worth: $28.9 billion

Washington Post: Billionaire, Jeff Bezos — the CEO of Amazon pledged to be handoff when he bought the venerable newspaper with a legacy of breaking Watergate, but he is now knee-deep into the day to day.

When Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos received an email from a reader complaining about the time it took for the mobile app to load, he immediately fired off a note to the newspaper’s chief information officer. The message was simple: fix it. “We looked at the problem and I told Jeff I thought we could improve the load time to maybe two seconds. He wrote back and said, ‘It needs to be milliseconds,’” said Shailesh Prakash, who heads the Post’s technology team as chief information officer. “He has become our ultimate beta tester,” reported the Wall Street Journal. Estimated Net Worth $46.9 billion

Prev Next

#2-TV Merger Mania

Hold on to your hat to follow the bouncing merger ball in local television mergers.

In Portland, KOIN is the station that is about to see yet another transition of ownership. It has already jumped from LIN to Media General to (it was going to be a merger with Meredith), but now NEXSTAR. Got that. More on KOIN’s fate in a moment. By the way KGW has gone from Belo to Gannett to now Tegna. KATU, which was owned by Fisher, but it was acquired by Sinclair in 2013.

As the financial world reported yesterday a deal is in full bloom with lots of complications, here is what the New York Times reports, “Six months ago, Media General rebuffed a takeover offer by the Nexstar Broadcasting Group. A few weeks later, Media General opted instead to acquire Meredith Corporation. But Nexstar was not about to let Media General get away, so it made a higher bid in late September, and then a third bid in November, both of which Media General rejected. The last bid, though, intrigued Media General enough that it said it would be willing to negotiate with Nextstar, hinting at a potential future combination.

On Thursday, t hose discussions appeared to reach a point of agreement. Media General said it had negotiated a deal in which Nexstar would acquire it for cash and stock for about $2.3 billion.

If you think TV mergers, plus more debt, plus more cuts to staffing are done - guess again.

Prev Next

#3-The Number TV is Scared Of and Should Be

Local and network TV are losing the most important viewers at an alarming rate.

The number of hours watching traditional TV by 18 to 24 -year-olds has dropped from 21 hours and 45 minutes a week to 15 hours and 30 minutes from 2013 to 2015. This number points to a massive shift in behavior and a loss of the next generation of viewers. Where did they go? Netflix and other forms of streaming. The behavior is so different that it will be difficult for ABC, CBS, BBC or Fox to get them back. What happens to PBS - will they know it ever existed.

According to Media Post, “Nielsen’s most recent “Total Audience Report” indicates that Americans aged 18-24 watched a weekly average of 15-and-a-half hours of traditional TV during Q3 2015. That represents a year-over-year decline of a little more than 2 hours per week. In other words, 18-24-year-olds as a group went from watching about 2-and-a-half hours per day during the third quarter of 2014 to a little more than 2 hours and ten minutes per day during Q3 of this year.”

Prev Next

#4-All is Not Happy in Digital Either

While Digital news is still growing significantly there are some hiccups. According to data released by digiday, grew from Nov of 2013 to Nov 2014 by 43% and monthly uniques decreases by 1 percent in the following 12 months.

Mashable which was up during the 2013 to 2014 period by 19 percent did pick up steam and grew by 32 percent in the following 12 month. Business Insider, Refinery29 and Quartz all had big 2013 to 2014 periods but them were hit hard and saw slower growth in those next 12 months.

Similarly, legacy media like the New York Times are straining to find new ways to grow their digital dollars.

“The digital reader revenue number passed the test, coming in at 14% year over year, for the quarter. There, the Times saw its greatest quarterly growth in three years, adding 51,000 to a new total of 1,041,000.

The digital ad number didn’t pass muster. In fact, digital ad revenue flagged for 3Q, down 5.0%. That might seem like an alarm, but it might be a blip.” writes Ken Doctor.

Prev Next

#5-Big Radio in Big Trouble

As GoLocal has reported in the past:

The two biggest radio companies in the United States are on the verge of massive restructuring or bankruptcy, as they each have billions of dollars in debt and little chance of managing the building financial obligations.

How bad is the situation? According to one leading radio analyst, the problem is catastrophic. “$20.5 billion in debt for iHeart — billions more than the city of Detroit when it went bankrupt. As I have been reporting, the venture capitalists are circling the carcass for a 2017 bankruptcy. At Cumulus, new CEO Mary Berner has done nothing new except hire another person from outside the industry…They want to go bankrupt and her experience taking Readers Digest into Chapter 11 is her qualification to be CEO,” said Jerry Del Colliano, Publisher, Inside Music Media.

iHeart radio (formerly Clear Channel) and Cumulus are both facing in economic turmoil and those two groups combined own massive numbers of stations across the United States

“iHeart has more debt — unplayable, at double digit interest rates and the junk bond markets just crashed. Cumulus has about $3 billion of debt that will have to be refinanced. Both are in an industry that is trending down. Break even is the new growth in radio. They’re both done,” said Del Colliano.

While iHeart Radio may be upside down by billions, its CEO Bob Pittman is still enjoying the fruits of his office. The former head of MTV's perks are significant. "SEC filings show Pittman, a perennial at the Burning Man festival, will get a $7.5 million golden parachute when he exits. The documents also show that his corporate perks include $900,000 in aircraft usage (Pittman is an accomplished pilot), $160,000 for security and $140,000 in car services," according to the New York Post.

In the past year, Cumulus has lost 90%+ of its stock value and is now trading at $0.30 per share. iHeart's stock has dropped from a 52-week high of $8 per share to $1.01.