Welcome! Login | Register
 

Derek Jeter, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady … Russell Wilson?—Derek Jeter, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady … Russell…

U.S. Unemployment Claims Soar to Record-Breaking 3.3 Million During Coronavirus Crisis—U.S. Unemployment Claims Soar to Record-Breaking 3.3 Million…

Harlem Globetrotters Icon Fred “Curley” Neal Passes Away at 77—Harlem Globetrotters Icon Fred “Curley” Neal Passes Away…

Boredom Busters – 3 Games The Family Needs While The World Waits For Sports—Boredom Busters – 3 Games The Family Needs…

REPORT: 2020 Olympics to be Postponed Due to Coronavirus Emergency—REPORT: 2020 Olympics to be Postponed Due to…

Convicted Rapist Weinstein Has Coronavirus, According to Reports—Convicted Rapist Weinstein Has Coronavirus, According to Reports

“Does Anyone Care About Politics Right Now?”—Sunday Political Brunch March 22, 2020—“Does Anyone Care About Politics Right Now?” --…

U.S. - Canada Border to Close for Non-Essential Travel—U.S. - Canada Border to Close for Non-Essential…

Broken Hearts & Lost Games – How The Coronavirus Affected Me—Broken Hearts & Lost Games – How The…

White House Considering Giving Americans Checks to Combat Economic Impact of Coronavirus—White House Considering Giving Americans Checks to Combat…

 
 

Oregon Receives Mediocre Ratings on Gallup Nation Wide Wellness Poll

Thursday, February 19, 2015

 

Gallup defines social wellness as having supportive relationships and love in your life

Oregonians recieved a mediocre rating for social wellness on a new Gallup study. Oregon ranks 24 out of the 50 states for social wellness, which Gallup defines as "having supportive relationships and love in your life."

South Dakotans rank highest on the list, while Rhode Islanders finish dead last. 

Gallup released their findings after interviewimg 176,702 adults across all States in the Union. Click here for a summary of their findings.  

Social wellness is one of five measures that Gallup uses in its overall evaluation of resident health. The other criteria are community connectedness, physical health, sense of purpose and financial wellbeing. So, thanks to Rhode Islanders’ relative physical fitness, they finish at 37 for overall wellbeing. It’s certainly not great, but a lot better than 50. Too much time spent in the gym listening to headphones?

Incidentally, the Gallup finds the two states located outside of the lower 48 ranking highest in overall wellbeing; Alaska leads the nation and Hawaii follows at a close second. 

Oregonian’s stay in the middle for nearly every category except for sense of purpose: “Liking what you do each day and being motivated to achieve your goals,” in which they finish at 41. Perhaps the city where people go to retire has dragged the state down a couple notches in this category. 

Overall, Oregon finishes at number 27 beating our neighbors to the North by one rank (although they have an edge on our financial wellbeing and our sense of purpose).   

The lowest ranking state is West Virginia, which ranks dead last in the physical and sense of purpose categories, followed by Kentucky. Both states have held their respective positions in the 50th and 49th slot for the past six years. All other states in the bottom ten are located either in the South or the Midwest. 

The highest-ranking states after Alaska and Hawaii start in Montana and proceed south through the Rockies all the way down to Texas. 

Those of us in the Pacific Northwest, it turns out, are as temperate as the climate we live in. Neither hot nor cold, we take one day at a time in even stride.

But is this really a surprise to any of us?   

 

Related Slideshow: 15 Portland Area Neighborhoods With Fastest Growing Poverty

A report from the City Observatory revealed the increasing poverty rates in the Portland metro-area for census tracks. Find which areas saw the highest increases in poverty.

Prev Next

#15

Eliot 

Poverty rate in 1970: 38 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Decrease in poverty rate: 4 percent

Prev Next

#14

Humboldt 

Poverty rate in 1970: 32 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 2 percent

Prev Next

#13

Buckman

Poverty rate in 1970: 29 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 32 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 3 percent

Prev Next

#12

West Portsmouth

Poverty rate in 1970: 25 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 30 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 5 percent

Prev Next

#11

North King

Poverty rate in 1970: 19 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 12 percent

Prev Next

#10

South Downtown

Poverty rate in 1970: 25 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 39 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 14 percent

Prev Next

#9

East Cully & North Roseway

Poverty rate in 1970: 15 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 16 percent

Prev Next

#8

North Downtown 

Poverty rate in 1970: 36 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 52 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 16 percent

Prev Next

#7

Goose Hollow 

Poverty rate in 1970: 21 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 40 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 19 percent

Prev Next

#6

Rockwood & North Centennial in Gresham 

Poverty rate in 1970: 10 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 30 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 20 percent

Prev Next

#5

University Park

Poverty rate in 1970: 10 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 32 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 22 percent

Prev Next

#4

Central Powelhurst-Gilbert

Poverty rate in 1970: 11 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 35 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 24 percent

Prev Next

#3

Maple Wood, Bagley Downs Neighborhood & Meadow Homes Neighborhood in Vancouver 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 26 percent

Prev Next

#2

Glenfair & South Wilkes 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 29 percent

Prev Next

#1

Fruit Valley in Vancouver 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 36 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 31 percent

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

X

Stay Connected — Free
Daily Email